• Research
  • Publications
    • --How to Sue a Robot
    • --Constitutional Policing and Compromise
    • --The Clash of Procedural Values
    • --Twombly and Iqbal at the State Level
    • --Transferred Justice: An Empirical Account of Federal Transfers in the Wake of Atlantic Marine
    • --Trans-Personal Procedures
    • --Rights come with Responsibilities: Personal Jurisdiction and Corporate Personhood
    • --Pleading and Proving Foreign Law in the Age of Plausibility Pleading
    • --Tremors of Things to Come: The Great Split between Federal and State Pleading Standards
    • --Assessing Iqbal after One Year: Effects and Proposals
    • --Creon's Secretaries: The Conceptual Foundations of the Procedural State
  • Teaching
  • Personal
  • Contact

Trans-Personal Procedures

This Article introduces and develops the concept of trans-personality. Trans-personality is the principle that procedural rules should not vary based on the personhood of the litigating parties. The Article then employs the concept of trans-personality to upend conventional wisdom in key procedural areas. I argue that personal jurisdiction doctrine must abandon the trans-personal norm and bifurcate into two branches, personal jurisdiction and entity jurisdiction, to account for fundamental differences between natural and artificial persons. A lack of personhood-specific flexibility imposes unnecessary costs. The existing literature attempts to deal with this rigidity problem but often identifies the wrong culprit (types of lawsuits, rather than types of entities). Trans-personality provides a better diagnosis and a better solution.

Preferred citation: Roger Michalski, Trans-Personal Procedures, 47
Conn. L. Rev.
321 (2014).

  Download as pdf

Questions? Suggestions?

Please contact me if you can't find something or have a comment, thought, or question.

Contact
Michalski -